Ektacolor Pro vs Portra: Kodak's new film names explained
Ektacolor Pro vs Portra, Ektapan vs T-Max: what Kodak's 2026 film names mean, why Eastman Kodak renamed them, and whether the film inside has changed.
· 5 min read · Film photography
Ektacolor Pro vs Portra is the film question of 2026, and the short answer is: same film, new name. On 24 March 2026, Eastman Kodak put six professional films on shelves under revived names. Portra became Ektacolor Pro, and T-Max became Ektapan.
If you've seen both boxes in a shop and wondered which one to buy, here's what changed, what didn't, and why Kodak did it.
Kodak's new film names at a glance
Six films changed names. The speeds line up exactly:
| Old name | New name | Type | Formats (new name) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portra 160 | Ektacolor Pro 160 | Colour negative | 35mm, 120 |
| Portra 400 | Ektacolor Pro 400 | Colour negative | 35mm, 120, 4x5 and 8x10 sheets |
| Portra 800 | Ektacolor Pro 800 | Colour negative | 35mm, 120 |
| T-Max 100 | Ektapan 100 | Black and white | 35mm, 120 |
| T-Max 400 | Ektapan 400 | Black and white | 35mm, 120 |
| T-Max P3200 | Ektapan P3200 | Black and white | 35mm only |
The other big names are unchanged. Kodak's own product list still shows Ektar 100, Gold 200, Ultramax 400, Tri-X 320 and 400, and Ektachrome E100 under their familiar names, alongside Kodacolor 100 and 200.
Is Ektacolor Pro the same as Portra?
Every source we checked says yes. Digital Camera World, PhotoWorkout and Fuji X Weekly all report that the emulsions are unchanged, and that what's new is the box and who ships it.
The paperwork backs that up, with one caveat. Kodak's page calls Ektacolor Pro 400 the world's sharpest and finest-grain 400-speed colour negative film, with exceptional skin tones and colour saturation from bright daylight to low light. That closely matches how Kodak Alaris's January 2025 datasheet describes Portra 400: the world's finest-grain high-speed colour negative film, with spectacular skin tones and exceptional saturation across a wide range of lighting. The speeds match, and so do the formats.
The caveat: the Kodak product pages we read don't mention Portra or T-Max by name. The "same emulsion" claim comes from coverage of the launch, not from a Kodak statement on those pages, and none of that coverage reported any difference in results.
So if you have a favourite way to expose and develop Portra 400, it should carry straight over. Same C-41 development, same box speed, same habits. The same goes for Ektapan and your usual T-Max developer.
Why Kodak renamed Portra and T-Max
It comes down to two Kodaks. After Eastman Kodak's 2012 bankruptcy, a separate company, Kodak Alaris, took over much of the film business from 2013: distribution, sales and branding. Eastman Kodak kept manufacturing, in Rochester. For over a decade, one Kodak made the film and another Kodak sold it.
According to PhotoWorkout, Eastman Kodak started bringing film distribution back in-house in September 2025, and the March 2026 launch completed that move for its professional films. The catch, as Fuji X Weekly explains it, is that making a film doesn't guarantee you can print its famous name on the box. Some Kodak trademarks are tied up in past agreements, so Eastman Kodak chose new names over buying the old ones back.
The new names aren't new at all:
- Ektacolor has been used by Kodak before, on professional colour material and colour paper. A lab quoted by Digital Camera World notes it was the name of Kodak's pro colour line before Portra existed.
- Ektapan was a Kodak black-and-white film, discontinued years ago, and now revived for the T-Max emulsions.
- Renaming is a Kodak habit. Fuji X Weekly points out that Kodacolor VR-G later became Gold, and Ultramax was once sold as Max Versatility.
Can you still buy Portra and T-Max?
Yes, for now. Kodak Alaris's site still features Portra, and Digital Camera World reported that Portra and T-Max boxes looked set to stay on sale alongside the new ones. Expect to see both names on shelves for a while.
At launch, PhotoWorkout reported prices starting at $10.99 a roll for Ektapan and $16.99 a roll for Ektacolor Pro, and suggested the direct-from-Kodak boxes could undercut Portra. Prices move, so check before you buy. For context on how film prices have shifted this year, our guide to film camera apps on Android cites Analog.Cafe's Q3 2026 price report.
A simple buying checklist:
- Pick by speed, not by name. Ektacolor Pro 400 and Portra 400 are the same stock by every account.
- Check the expiry date. Fresher film beats the right logo.
- Compare the per-roll price. If one box is cheaper, that's your answer.
- Write the box name in your notes. Labs, scanning presets and your future self will thank you.
What it means for your photos
Nothing, and that's the point. A film's look comes from its emulsion and how you expose and develop it, not from the name on the canister. If you love how Portra renders skin, Ektacolor Pro should render it the same way. We unpack what that rendering actually is, from highlight roll-off to stock colour, in what makes a photo look like film.
The one place names matter is search. Recipes, presets and scanning profiles that say "Portra" now describe a film sold as Ektacolor Pro. If you're hunting for examples or settings, search both names.
Where trycheese fits
We think about this a lot, because a film look on a phone is also a look, not a label. trycheese's film looks are our own, hand-tuned around how film actually behaves: grain, filmic tone and halation around bright lights. They aren't stand-ins for a box of Portra, and real film photography is still its own joy.
trycheese is coming to iPhone and Android, free at launch. It isn't out yet. In the meantime, if you've got a roll of either name in the fridge, go shoot it.
Questions people ask
Is Kodak Ektacolor Pro the same as Portra?
By every account so far, yes: the same emulsions in a new box. Ektacolor Pro 160, 400 and 800 line up with Portra 160, 400 and 800, and Kodak's description of Ektacolor Pro 400 closely matches its Portra 400 datasheet. Kodak's product pages don't mention Portra by name.
What is Kodak Ektapan?
Ektapan is Eastman Kodak's new name for its T-Max black-and-white films: Ektapan 100, Ektapan 400 and Ektapan P3200. The name revives an old, discontinued Kodak black-and-white film.
Why did Kodak rename Portra and T-Max?
Eastman Kodak, which makes the film, now distributes it directly instead of through Kodak Alaris, which handled sales and branding after Kodak's 2012 bankruptcy. Coverage of the switch says the old names stayed tied up in that arrangement, so Eastman Kodak revived older names instead.
Can you still buy Portra?
Portra-branded film hasn't vanished: Kodak Alaris still features it, and reports at the switch said Portra and T-Max boxes would stay on sale alongside the new names. If the film is the same, buy whichever box is fresher and cheaper.
Sources
- EKTACOLOR PRO 400 Film — Kodak
- EKTAPAN — Kodak
- Still film products — Kodak
- Kodak Professional Portra 400 Film, technical data E-4050 — Kodak Alaris (January 2025)
- Photographers — Kodak Alaris
- Kodak Launches Ektacolor Pro and Ektapan Film: Portra and T-Max Get New Names — PhotoWorkout (26 March 2026)
- Kodak Renames Portra and T-Max — Fuji X Weekly (26 March 2026)
- Kodak's camera films have just changed names – and they come from a different Kodak. Confused? — Digital Camera World (27 May 2026)
Keep reading.
· Film looks
What makes a photo look like film? 6 tells, explained
What makes a photo look like film? Highlight roll-off, stock colour, grain, halation and softness: how each one works, and how to spot a fake film look.
6 min read
· Grain & halation
What is halation? The red glow around lights, explained
What is halation? Why film puts a red-orange glow around streetlights, how it differs from bloom and lens flare, and how to spot a convincing digital version.
5 min read
· Phone photography
Why phone photos look overprocessed (and how to fix it)
Why phone photos look overprocessed: HDR merging, sharpening and smoothing. Plus the settings that tone it down on iPhone, Pixel and Galaxy phones in 2026.
6 min read